Following the article in British Journal of Pharmacy by Harry O'Brien, Anna Hatt and James Stones on the consequences of Brexit for pharmaceutical patents and supplementary protection certificates, author Harry O'Brien has written a blogpost briefly explaining their research:
A recent paper in the British Journal of Pharmacy from the
University of Huddersfield Press discusses the implications of Brexit on
patents and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).
The overall message from the authors is that UK
pharmaceutical companies wishing to obtain European patents will be able to do
so in the same way as they did before Brexit. Meanwhile, the long held
dream of achieving a new simpler and cheaper patent system across Europe has
suffered a huge setback after the UK government made clear it would no longer
take part in such a system; a symptom of pursuing a “hard Brexit”.
For SPCs, there are changes which have caused undesired
effects, even though EU law for SPCs has more or less been imported into UK
statute. Some changes may be beneficial for pharmaceutical companies
wishing to extend their protection for their products in the UK. For
example, obtaining a six month paediatric extension of a UK SPC now only
requires UK regulatory approval, rather than EU regulatory approval.
On the other hand, the issues with Northern Ireland continue to pose a headache due to the jurisdiction of EU law, meaning that UK SPCs are now territorial depending on where marketing authorisations are obtained. In the news just recently, evidence of a hard border for medicines has recently come to light with the availability of a new cancer treatment that is available in Great Britain, but not Northern Ireland.
What will be interesting to see in the long term is how
pharmaceutical companies will make use of the SPC new manufacturing waiver for
generics, allowing stockpiling and export of SPC protected medicines outside of
the UK and EU. Furthermore, with the UK no longer bound by the Court of Justice
of the European Union, how will UK case law begin to diverge from EU case
law? And will this benefit, or hinder, UK pharmaceutical companies?
Back to News List